Methodology - How We Research and Rank

Data first, prose second

Every casino entry is a structured fact set: XMR support type, KYC type and trigger threshold, VPN policy, registration model, withdrawal speed, limits, bonuses, wagering, fairness, reputation notes and sources with dates. Reviews are AI-drafted from that fact set only - the model may not invent numbers, limits or history. Drafts are fact-checked against the database before publication, and every fact row carries a verification date.

Where facts come from

Operator deposit pages and terms, community directories (Monerica, KYCnot.me), independent testing reports (e.g. 99Bitcoins no-KYC tests, ProvenlyFair research) and player reports. Quality is flagged per casino: verified, reported or unverified. Unverified facts are labeled in reviews, never presented as confirmed.

Scoring

Editorial scores (0-10) are weighted: privacy 22%, safety 20%, payout speed 16%, games 14%, bonus 10%, fairness 8%, UX 10%. XMR-native micro sites are scored within their own lane - a two-game dice site cannot "lose" for game count against an 8,000-game casino; it is rated on what it is. User ratings are shown separately, smoothed with a statistical prior, and never mixed into editorial scores.

Freshness

Availability of XMR support changes fast. We run daily reachability checks on every listed domain and regenerate reviews on a weekly cycle (plus on-demand whenever facts change). Every review shows its version, generation date and fact-verification date.

Independence

Commercial relationships never influence scores, ranks or scam listings. Operators can submit factual corrections with sources via contact; we verify and correct within 7 days. We do not remove scam or dead listings in exchange for anything.